The Movement, the Event

Yve Lomax juxtaposes three images to construct a singular form in her artwork.  Her book Sounding the Event asks the question: how can a photograph be an event? The singularity of the three images present goes a long way to asking the same question.  I take it a step further to interrogate the way thinking through events, i.e. thinking through movement and the way movement is represented, can challenge our perspectives, our borders, and our capacity to understand the world around us.  Lomax's book employs a peculiar form to get at these questions and become movement itself.  She takes critical theory and turns it into a conversation, asking the questions that we all wish we could pose and exploring the possible answers from the perspective of diverse theories.  The text becomes an experience as the reader uncovers the layers of the conversation and pieces together the parts of the event.  Take my word, it is a completely new way to think through critical theory that raises various issues, the issues embodied in the above artwork.

Affect, movement, and embodiment come together in the three segments bringing forth an ethical engagement with the event.  The event of what?  Possibly, of movement itself.  The face provokes a response, at least through a Levinasian interaction where the face obligates an ethical response, and by proxy a confrontation with the identity of the other. I leave it at identity, because the face seems to be the signifier of an identity and nothing more. The hollow eyes and shadowy contours leave a sense of mystery, but the definitive face leaves the ethical obligation in tact. But what emotion is contained therein?  A sense of loss?  Maybe. A confusion that leads to questioning? I would like to think so.  Either way, it is appropriately vague and offering itself up to be questioned.  I take this as a question of identity where the face only imparts a partial view of somebody, which leads to the middle image.  The bridge is blurred but nonetheless bridges the gap. It links the right and the left with the sense of movement, as if one were in the process of crossing.  The link to be made through this movement is between the face and the body, the images to either side appear static compared to the bridge.  If the face invokes an ethical obligation, what does the body do?  It does the same.  A body perched on the edge of what appears to be subway tracks; the headlight of the train in the distance, movement and arrival at the static, waiting body.  The waiting body steps up to the void left when the face is turned away, the void that is in the absence of identity.  It suggests that the body waits for its ethical recognition outside of the recognition of the face, the identity of the subject in a culture of identity politics.  It amounts to a reconsideration of the ethical obligated by embodiment and outside of identity, something a singular event, when pieced together and fully considered, does.  The figure on the right is contained within a long black coat that shields the body in absence.   The event attempts to unveil this absence by uncovering the layers of representations that construct bodies and prioritize superficial identities in the contemporary world. The event ties the body to a singular occurrence that shakes it out of the confined space society offers.  It allows for presence through the absence of existing narratives.  A definition to come, rather than offering one to fit.  An ethical movement. 

Comments

[Monica]

You say: "If the face invokes an ethical obligation, what does the body do? It does the same."

You are a Levinasian, whether you realize it or not. The face IS the body, in many ways, because the face says, literally "Thou shalt not kill the body."